All in Regulatory Update

On 7/7/2020, the CFPB issued a ratification of a number of previous actions taken by the Bureau, including the large majority of existing regulations. This act of making prior actions officially valid provides financial institutions with clarity that the CFPB’s rules and regulations are still valid in light of a recent court ruling (Seila Law) that the removal provision of the CFPB Director violates law and that the Director must be removable by the President at will. The Seila Law ruling also held that the agency may continue to operate, and this ratification provides clarification to the financial industry that official actions taken by the CFPB from January 4, 2012 to June 30, 2020 are still valid.

On 7/7/2020, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued advisory FIN-2020-A003 to alert financial institutions to potential indicators of imposter scams and money mule schemes, which are two forms of consumer fraud that have been discovered so far during the COVID-19 pandemic. This advisory contains descriptions of imposter scams and money mule schemes, financial red flag indicators for both, and information on reporting suspicious activity.

On 7/6/2020, the CFPB announced the filing of a lawsuit against My Loan Doctor LLC and its founder, Edgar Radjabli. In their release, the CFPB alleges that “Loan Doctor and Radjabli made several false, misleading, and inaccurate marketing representations in advertising Loan Doctor’s “Healthcare Finance (HCF) Savings CD Account,” in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s (CFPA) prohibition against deceptive acts or practices. As the Bureau’s complaint alleges, starting in August 2019, Loan Doctor took more than $15 million from at least 400 consumers who opened and deposited money into Loan Doctor’s deceptively advertised product.”

On 7/2/2020, the CFPB released a notice of proposed rulemaking that would change Regulation Z to provide a new exemption available to certain banks and credit unions from the requirements to establish escrow accounts for certain higher-priced mortgage loans (HPMLs). This proposal is the Bureau’s last required rule under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA).

On 6/30/2020, the CFPB published its Spring 2020 rulemaking agenda which lists items the CFPB expects to focus on between May 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. In their release, the CFPB pointed out that the planning process for this agenda began months before the COVID-19 pandemic, so it may not reflect everything that actually occurs, especially as related to the pandemic.

On 7/1/2020, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) issued a statement to highlight the risks that will result from the transition away from LIBOR, which is used by the financial industry as a reference rate for many products and instruments like loans, investments, and deposits. In their release, the regulators encouraged financial institutions to continue working toward a transition to alternative reference rates so that financial, legal, operational, and consumer protection risks can be mitigated. While the transition away from the LIBOR will affect some institutions more than others, the regulators state that the impact will affect almost all institutions and, therefore, it would be beneficial for all financial institutions to consider the risks associated with the LIBOR transition.

On 6/29/2020, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued an updated section to their Comptroller’s Handbook by releasing a new “Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices and Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices” booklet. In their release, the OCC explains that highlights of this booklet include…

On June 29, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision related to the structure, and specifically the Director’s authority, of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). In their ruling, the courts determined that the current structure - which only allows the single CFPB Director to be removed by the President for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” - is unconstitutional. Therefore, the ruling has now established that the President can, in fact, remove the CFPB Director at will. That said, the CFPB can continue to operate, but the ruling establishes that the Director must be removable by the President “at will.”